logo
Y&X Beijing Technology Co., Ltd.
Di noi
Il tuo partner professionale e affidabile.
Y&X Beijing Technology Co., Ltd. è un fornitore di soluzioni professionali per il beneficiamento delle miniere di metalli, con soluzioni leader a livello mondiale per il beneficiamento refrattario.abbiamo accumulato ricca esperienza di successo nei campi di rame, molibdeno, oro, argento, piombo, zinco, nichel, magnesio, scheelite e altre miniere di metalli, miniere di metalli rari come il cobalto, il palladio,Bismuto e altre miniere non metalliche come la fluorite e il fosforo. e può fornire ...
Scopri di più

0

Anno di istituzione

0

Milioni+
Impiegati

0

Milioni+
Vendite annuali
La CINA Y&X Beijing Technology Co., Ltd. Alta qualità
Sigillo di fiducia, controllo del credito, RoSH e valutazione della capacità dei fornitori. La nostra azienda ha un rigoroso sistema di controllo della qualità e un laboratorio di prova professionale.
La CINA Y&X Beijing Technology Co., Ltd. Sviluppo
Team interno di progettazione professionale e laboratorio di macchinari avanzati. Possiamo collaborare per sviluppare i prodotti di cui avete bisogno.
La CINA Y&X Beijing Technology Co., Ltd. Fabbricazione
Macchine automatiche avanzate, sistema di controllo rigoroso. Possiamo produrre tutti i terminali elettrici oltre la vostra richiesta.
La CINA Y&X Beijing Technology Co., Ltd. SERVIZIO AL 100%
Imballaggio piccolo sfuso e personalizzato, FOB, CIF, DDU e DDP. Lasciaci aiutarti a trovare la soluzione migliore per tutte le tue esigenze.

qualità Reagenti di galleggiamento & Reagenti di galleggiamento della schiuma fabbricante

Trova prodotti che soddisfino meglio le tue esigenze.
Casi e notizie
Gli ultimi punti caldi
Where do you add your flotation reagents?
.gtr-container-e8f3d1 { font-family: Verdana, Helvetica, "Times New Roman", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.6; color: #333; max-width: 100%; padding: 15px; margin: 0 auto; box-sizing: border-box; } .gtr-container-e8f3d1 p { margin-bottom: 1em; text-align: left !important; } .gtr-container-e8f3d1 strong { color: #2583AE; font-weight: bold; } .gtr-container-e8f3d1-intro { margin-bottom: 1em; } .gtr-container-e8f3d1-highlight { font-weight: bold; color: #2583AE; margin-bottom: 1.5em; } .gtr-container-e8f3d1-subheading-text { font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; color: #2583AE; margin-top: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 0.8em; text-align: left !important; } .gtr-container-e8f3d1-subheading { font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; color: #2583AE; margin-top: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 0.8em; text-align: left !important; } .gtr-container-e8f3d1 ul { list-style: none !important; padding-left: 0; margin-left: 0; margin-bottom: 1em; } .gtr-container-e8f3d1 li { position: relative; padding-left: 0; margin-bottom: 0.5em; text-align: left !important; } .gtr-container-e8f3d1-icon { display: inline-block; width: 25px; text-align: center; color: #2583AE; font-weight: bold; margin-right: 5px; } .gtr-container-e8f3d1-sub-list { margin-top: 0.5em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; padding-left: 20px; } .gtr-container-e8f3d1-sub-list li { padding-left: 20px; } .gtr-container-e8f3d1-sub-list li::before { content: "•" !important; position: absolute !important; left: 0 !important; top: 0; color: #2583AE; font-size: 1.2em; line-height: 1.6; } .gtr-container-e8f3d1-section { margin-top: 2em; padding: 1.5em; border-radius: 8px; background-color: rgba(37, 131, 174, 0.08); } .gtr-container-e8f3d1-footer { font-style: italic; color: #555; margin-top: 2em; } @media (min-width: 768px) { .gtr-container-e8f3d1 { max-width: 800px; padding: 20px; } } Most plants default to one of two spots—the mill discharge or the flotation cells. And most operators assume it doesn’t matter much. It does. And the difference can be 3–10% recovery. Here’s why: the dosing point determines three critical factors: 🔄 Dispersion efficiency 🧲 Adsorption conditions ⏱️ Reaction time Just a few meters along the process flow can completely change all three. Generally, the dosing point for modifiers is prioritized over that of collectors and frothers. Since pH establishes the fundamental environment for flotation, modifiers are usually added first to set the proper conditions before collectors and frothers are introduced at the appropriate locations. This article discusses the characteristics of different dosing points for collectors. Adding at Conditioning Tank: ✅ Best for: Minerals with fresh, unoxidized surfaces (higher activity → stronger adsorption) Ore types that are hard-to-float Situations where extended contact time (5–15 min) matters ✅ Extra benefit: Grinding media provides natural, uniform dispersion—no extra mixing needed. Adding Directly to Cells: ✅ Best for: Pulp already adjusted to optimal pH Stage addition strategies (bulk in roughing, top-up in scavenging) ✅ Extra benefit: Lower total reagent consumption. Real-world example: In copper ore flotation, shifting xanthate addition from the cells back to the mill discharge increased copper recovery by 2.5%—with zero change in reagent type or dosage. So how do you decide? For oxidized ores, finely disseminated sulfide ores, or material finer than 200 mesh → conditioning tank is usually your answer.But the real key is this: your lab flotation time tests are the foundation. Get that right, and your industrial process design follows. 👉Do you currently add your collectors upstream or directly to the cells? 👉 And which ore type do you process most—sulfide, oxide, or complex? Drop your answer below—I’ll personally respond with tailored suggestions based on your setup. 👇 At Y&X, we don‘t just supply reagents—we help you place them where they work hardest. Because the right chemistry in the wrong place is still wasted potential.
Parliamo della lavorazione dei minerali
.gtr-container-mpterms123 { --primary-color: #2583AE; --primary-light-bg: #e0f2f7; --text-color: #333; --heading-color: #1a5a7a; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Verdana, Helvetica, "Times New Roman", Arial, sans-serif; color: var(--text-color); font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.6; padding: 20px; max-width: 900px; margin: 0 auto; } .gtr-container-mpterms123 p { margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 1em; text-align: left !important; } .gtr-container-mpterms123 .gtr-section-title { font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; color: var(--heading-color); margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 1em; text-align: left; } .gtr-container-mpterms123 dl { margin-bottom: 1.5em; padding-left: 0; } .gtr-container-mpterms123 dt { font-weight: bold; color: var(--primary-color); margin-top: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; display: block; text-align: left; } .gtr-container-mpterms123 dd { margin-left: 0; padding-left: 15px; border-left: 3px solid var(--primary-light-bg); text-align: left !important; } .gtr-container-mpterms123 ul { list-style: none !important; padding-left: 0; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1.5em; } .gtr-container-mpterms123 ul li { position: relative; padding-left: 25px; margin-bottom: 0.8em; text-align: left !important; list-style: none !important; } .gtr-container-mpterms123 ul li::before { content: "•" !important; position: absolute !important; left: 0 !important; color: var(--primary-color); font-size: 1.2em; line-height: 1; top: 0; } @media (min-width: 768px) { .gtr-container-mpterms123 { padding: 30px; } .gtr-container-mpterms123 .gtr-section-title { font-size: 20px; } } Ti sei mai chiesto: perché alcune rocce hanno un valore immenso mentre altre servono solo per pavimentare le strade?Perché agli occhi dei geologi le rocce si dividono in due categorie: utili e inutili.Ma agli occhi degli ingegneri della lavorazione dei minerali, il loro intero lavoro è separare l'"utile" dall'"inutile", e più netta è la separazione, meglio è.Oggi analizziamo questi termini tecnici nel settore della lavorazione dei minerali in termini profani. Lavorazione dei minerali: Un processo di massimizzazione della separazione di minerali preziosi dai minerali della ganga, rimuovendo la ganga per arricchire minerali preziosi o separando minerali preziosi coesistenti l'uno dall'altro, per ottenere prodotti di alta qualità (che possono essere singoli o multipli). Roccia: Un aggregato di minerali composto da una o più specie minerali; in alternativa, il materiale costituente la litosfera terrestre (guscio esterno). Minerale: Roccia che, nelle attuali condizioni tecnologiche, può essere lavorata per estrarre metalli o altri composti, o può essere utilizzata direttamente per tale estrazione. Minerale: Un elemento o composto naturale formatosi nella crosta terrestre, caratterizzato da una composizione chimica specifica e proprietà fisico-chimiche distinte. Minerale prezioso: Minerali, minerali o rocce che possono essere utilizzati dagli esseri umani; si noti che il concetto di "minerale prezioso" è relativo. Reagenti di flottazione: Agenti chimici utilizzati durante il processo di flottazione del minerale per modificare le proprietà superficiali del minerale, aumentare o ridurre la galleggiabilità e regolare le caratteristiche della pasta e la stabilità della schiuma per facilitare la separazione dei minerali. I comuni reagenti di flottazione includono collettori, schiumatori, modificatori, depressori e attivatori. Grado del minerale: Il contenuto di uno specifico componente metallico, non metallico o altro componente prezioso all'interno del minerale. Viene tipicamente espresso in percentuale (ad esempio, per elementi comuni come rame, piombo e zinco); come contenuto del costituente prezioso (ad esempio, per niobio, titanio o fluorite); o in grammi per tonnellata di minerale (ad esempio, per l'oro o l'argento). Grado Run-of-Mine (ROM): La percentuale di uno specifico metallo, non metallo o altro componente prezioso del minerale che entra nell'impianto di lavorazione rispetto alla massa totale del minerale grezzo. Grado di concentrato: La percentuale di un metallo specifico (o componente non metallico/di valore) contenuto nel concentrato rispetto alla massa totale del concentrato. Grado degli sterili: La percentuale di un metallo specifico (o componente non metallico/di valore) contenuto negli sterili rispetto alla massa totale degli sterili. Ecco un riepilogo dei termini chiave di oggi: Minerale: roccia che può essere redditizia. Minerali utili: minerali che gli esseri umani possono utilizzare (anche se "utili" è un termine relativo). Reagenti di flottazione: sostanze chimiche che fanno galleggiare minerali preziosi lasciando affondare materiali senza valore. Grado: il contenuto del minerale target all'interno del minerale, espresso in percentuale (%) o in grammi per tonnellata (g/t). Concentrato contro residui: il primo è ciò che desideri; quest'ultimo è ciò che scarti. Il voto determina direttamente se realizzi o meno un profitto. Vuoi sentire maggiori dettagli? Ad esempio, cosa sono esattamente la "flottazione" o i "collettori"? Fatemelo sapere nei commenti e ne parlerò nel prossimo post.
Japan finds heavy rare earths dominate seabed deposit
.gtr-container-re7s8d { font-family: Verdana, Helvetica, "Times New Roman", Arial, sans-serif; color: #333; line-height: 1.6; padding: 16px; box-sizing: border-box; overflow-wrap: break-word; word-break: normal; } .gtr-container-re7s8d { --primary-color: #2583AE; --primary-dark: #1e6a8e; --text-color: #333; --secondary-text-color: #555; --border-color: #ddd; --light-background: #f8fcfd; } .gtr-container-re7s8d p { margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 1em; font-size: 14px; text-align: left !important; } .gtr-container-re7s8d__heading { font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; color: var(--primary-color); margin-top: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; padding-bottom: 0.3em; border-bottom: 1px solid var(--border-color); } .gtr-container-re7s8d em { font-style: italic; color: var(--primary-color); } .gtr-container-re7s8d__source { font-size: 12px; color: var(--secondary-text-color); margin-top: 2em; padding-top: 1em; border-top: 1px solid var(--border-color); text-align: left !important; } .gtr-container-re7s8d__source a { color: var(--primary-color); text-decoration: none; } .gtr-container-re7s8d__source a:hover { text-decoration: underline; color: var(--primary-dark); } @media (min-width: 768px) { .gtr-container-re7s8d { padding: 24px 32px; } .gtr-container-re7s8d p { margin-bottom: 1.2em; } .gtr-container-re7s8d__heading { font-size: 20px; } } Japan said on Friday that medium and heavy rare earth elements accounted for about 54% of the rare earth content in deep-sea mud recovered off a remote Pacific island, bolstering its push to secure domestic supplies of critical minerals as China tightens export controls. The government-backed mining vessel Chikyu recovered about 50 tonnes of mud during a month-long mission completed in February near Minamitori Island, about 1,900 km southeast of Tokyo. The expedition marked the world’s first successful continuous recovery of rare earth-bearing seabed mud from a depth of about 6 km. “The trial is expected to verify the feasibility of domestic rare earth production,” Kazushige Kikuchi, project manager at the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, told Reuters. A comprehensive assessment of the project’s commercial potential is due by March 2028. Cut China reliance The project could help Japan reduce its dependence on China for strategic minerals used in defence equipment, electric vehicles and advanced technologies. Beijing imposed export controls on some heavy rare earths and related magnets in April 2025 before tightening restrictions on shipments to Japan in January and twice more the following month. Japan’s government did not disclose the size of the rare earth deposit or the concentration of material in the recovered mud. Officials said the limited duration and geographic scope of the sampling program provided insufficient data for a broader resource estimate. Analysis identified yttrium, used in aerospace, energy and semiconductor applications; gadolinium, used in magnetic resonance imaging and other high-tech products; and dysprosium, an essential component in high-performance magnets for electric vehicles. In 2024, researchers from the University of Tokyo and the Nippon Foundation had already identified over 200 million tonnes of manganese nodules rich in battery metals in the Pacific Ocean, highlighting vast resource potential at depths around 5,500 meters. A separate survey by the University of Tokyo and the Nippon Foundation estimated the seabed nodules contain approximately 610,000 tonnes of cobalt—enough for 75 years of Japan’s consumption—and 740,000 tonnes of nickel, covering 11 years of domestic demand. Commercial test Japan plans a new month-long mining trial in the same waters beginning in February 2027, targeting production of 350 tonnes of mud a day. The material will be dewatered on Minamitori Island, about 1,900 km southeast of Tokyo, before being shipped to the mainland for separation, refining and smelting tests. The pilot program is designed to determine whether the offshore resource can support commercial rare earth production and reduce Japan’s dependence on imported supplies. source:https://www.mining.com/japan-finds-heavy-rare-earths-dominate-seabed-deposit/

2026

07/27

US estimates federal coal could power nation for 600 years
.gtr-container-x7y2z9 { font-family: Verdana, Helvetica, "Times New Roman", Arial, sans-serif; color: #333; line-height: 1.6; padding: 15px; max-width: 100%; box-sizing: border-box; border: none !important; } .gtr-container-x7y2z9 * { box-sizing: border-box; } .gtr-container-x7y2z9 p { margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 1em; font-size: 14px; text-align: left !important; word-break: normal; overflow-wrap: normal; } .gtr-container-x7y2z9 .gtr-title { font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; color: #2583AE; margin-bottom: 1.5em; text-align: left !important; } .gtr-container-x7y2z9 .gtr-subtitle { font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; color: #2583AE; margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 1em; text-align: left !important; border-bottom: 1px solid #e0e0e0; padding-bottom: 0.5em; } .gtr-container-x7y2z9 blockquote { margin: 1.5em 0; padding: 1em 1.5em; border-left: 4px solid #2583AE; background-color: #e0f0f7; font-style: italic; color: #555; text-align: left !important; } .gtr-container-x7y2z9 .gtr-source { margin-top: 2em; font-size: 12px; color: #777; text-align: left !important; } .gtr-container-x7y2z9 a { color: #2583AE; text-decoration: none; } .gtr-container-x7y2z9 a:hover { text-decoration: underline; color: #1e6a8e; } @media (min-width: 768px) { .gtr-container-x7y2z9 { padding: 25px; max-width: 800px; margin: 0 auto; } .gtr-container-x7y2z9 .gtr-title { font-size: 22px; } .gtr-container-x7y2z9 .gtr-subtitle { font-size: 18px; } } Coal beneath federally managed public lands could supply the United States for at least 600 years at current consumption rates, according to a new assessment, reinforcing the Trump administration’s efforts to revive the industry. The report released by the US Geological Survey (USGS) estimates there are 4.2 billion short tons of reported coal reserves associated with active mines and another 356 billion short tons of available coal resources on federally managed lands. In 2024, 34 coal mines on federal lands produced more than 261 million short tons, according to the USGS. Wyoming accounts for 14 of those mines and holds 87% of reported reserves associated with active federal mines, with the North Antelope Rochelle mine in the Powder River Basin identified as the world’s largest coal mine by reported reserves. “American Energy Dominance is more important than ever, and so is beautiful clean coal’s role in the production of electricity needed to fuel our future prosperity,” Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement. “Thanks to the USGS’s rigorous and independent assessment, we’re better equipped to manage America’s vast public lands responsibly while supporting energy security and economic opportunity.” The assessment supports President Donald Trump’s efforts to revive the coal sector. Trump signed Executive Order 14261 directing the review of coal resources beneath federal lands, while Burgum added metallurgical coal to the 2025 List of Critical Minerals. The report also calls for additional geological mapping in Alaska, where the USGS estimates at least 140 billion short tons of coal resources, but says the state could contain as much as 5.5 trillion short tons. Policy divide Twenty-nine of the active federal mines produce thermal coal for electricity generation, three Alabama operations produce metallurgical coal for steelmaking, one Colorado mine supplies the cement industry and one Utah mine remains idled. Federal lands covered by the study are administered by the Departments of Agriculture, Defense, Energy and Interior, along with the Tennessee Valley Authority. The report arrives as the Trump administration has committed more than $1 billion to bolster the US coal industry, including funding to extend the operating lives of coal-fired power plants and expand coal production capacity. The policy marks a sharp departure from climate scientists, who continue to argue that reducing coal, oil and gas consumption is essential to limiting global warming and avoiding more severe climate impacts. source:https://www.mining.com/us-estimates-federal-coal-could-power-nation-for-600-years/

2026

07/27

In June, the world crude steel output increased by 1.7% year on year
According to the statistics of 70 countries by the World Iron and Steel Association, in June, the world crude steel output was 155.7 million tons, a year-on-year increase of 1.7%. The output in the first half of the year was 931.5 million tons, down by 0.7%. China, the world's largest producer of crude steel, produced 83.7 million tons in June, up 0.4%. The output in the first half of the year was 500 million tons, down by 3.0%. Among other Asian countries, India's output in June was 14.1 million tons, an increase of 4.5%; The output in the first half of the year was 87 million tons, an increase of 7.1%. Japan's output in June was 6.8 million tons, an increase of 1.3%; In the first half of the year, the output was 40.4 million tons, down 0.4%. South Korea's output in June was 5.3 million tons, down 0.9%; The output in the first half of the year was 31.7 million tons, up by 2.1%. Vietnam's output in June was 2.6 million tons, an increase of 27.5%; In the first half of the year, the output was 15.2 million tons, up by 26.9%, still the fastest growing country. Turkey's output in June was 3.3 million tons, an increase of 14.7%; The output in the first half of the year was 19.8 million tons, an increase of 8.1%. The output of the 27 EU countries in June was 10.8 million tons, an increase of 4.6%; The output in the first half of the year was 65.4 million tons, down by 0.3%. Among them, Germany's output in June was 2.9 million tons, an increase of 9.5%; The output in the first half of the year was 18.6 million tons, an increase of 8.9%. Russia's output in June was 5.6 million tons, down 3.4%; In the first half of the year, the output was 32.1 million tons, down 8.4%. The US output in June was 7.2 million tons, an increase of 3.5%; The output in the first half of the year was 42.8 million tons, an increase of 6.3%. Brazil's output in June was 2.8 million tons, an increase of 0.1%; In the first half of the year, the output was 16.3 million tons, down 1.5%. source:https://geoglobal.mnr.gov.cn/zx/kydt/zhyw/202607/t20260724_10278948.htm

2026

07/24